IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/oxdevs/v49y2021i2p169-183.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Revisions of the global multidimensional poverty index: indicator options and their empirical assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Sabina Alkire
  • Usha Kanagaratnam

Abstract

This paper examines how normative reasoning was applied to empirical applications of different indicator options in order to revise the global Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) indicators in 2018, to better align with the SDGs. Given the emphasis in the SDGs on leaving no one behind, the household surveys used to estimate the global MPI were explored to see which could create individual-level MPIs, however this sharply reduced country coverage by half. Consistent criteria is applied to assess whether 33 potential additional indicators could be added to strengthen the global MPI. A certain set of criteria applied rules out new indicators. Finally, the paper both illustrates and describes the iterative interplay of normative and technical considerations underlying adjustments in three original indicators – child mortality, nutrition, and housing – which involves considering the joint distribution of alternative indicators across twenty trial measures for all countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Sabina Alkire & Usha Kanagaratnam, 2021. "Revisions of the global multidimensional poverty index: indicator options and their empirical assessment," Oxford Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(2), pages 169-183, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:oxdevs:v:49:y:2021:i:2:p:169-183
    DOI: 10.1080/13600818.2020.1854209
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13600818.2020.1854209
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13600818.2020.1854209?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Woojin Jung, 2022. "The Discrepancy Between Two Approaches to Global Poverty: What Does it Reveal?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 162(3), pages 1313-1344, August.
    2. Alkire, Sabina & Nogales, Ricardo & Quinn, Natalie Naïri & Suppa, Nicolai, 2023. "On track or not? Projecting the global Multidimensional Poverty Index," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    3. Fei Wang & Yuan Zhang & Clem Tisdell & Hong Liu, 2021. "Progress in Reducing the Poverty of Ethnic Minority Groups in China," Social Economics, Policy and Development Working Papers 313747, University of Queensland, School of Economics.
    4. Nick Bernards, 2023. "From Multiple Deprivations to Exploitation: Politicizing the Multidimensional Poverty Index," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 54(5), pages 1374-1395, September.
    5. Tang, Kai & Li, Zhenshan & He, Chun, 2023. "Spatial distribution pattern and influencing factors of relative poverty in rural China," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 2(1).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oxdevs:v:49:y:2021:i:2:p:169-183. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CODS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.