IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/oxdevs/v48y2020i3p240-255.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Union ‘facilitation effect’ and access to non-wage benefits in the Ghanaian labour market

Author

Listed:
  • Nkechi S. Owoo
  • Monica Puoma Lambon-Quayefio
  • Jorge Dávalos
  • Samuel B. Manu

Abstract

Effective access to mandatory non-wage benefits is key to workers achieving decent working conditions. This paper investigates the effects of union presence on workers’ access to non-wage benefits in the Ghanaian labor market. The study draws its data from the 2012–2013 Ghana Living Standards Survey (GLSS 6) and specifies a multivariate model that simultaneously controls for endogeneity and potential sample-selection biases. We find that unions have a significant effect on facilitation among workers by improving awareness of and access to work benefits. Other factors that affect benefit entitlements in Ghana include the gender of a worker, urbanization, firm size, sector formality, public v.s. private sector jobs, type of occupation, and the presence of work contracts amongst others. Results presented here indicate that workers from formal-sector firms with union presence are more likely to have access to non-wage benefits. It is also found that despite the statutory nature of these non-wage benefits, non-compliance was common, predominantly in the informal sector but also in the formal sector. This is particularly the case with respect to maternity leave benefits and indicates a need for greater enforcement of these laws.

Suggested Citation

  • Nkechi S. Owoo & Monica Puoma Lambon-Quayefio & Jorge Dávalos & Samuel B. Manu, 2020. "Union ‘facilitation effect’ and access to non-wage benefits in the Ghanaian labour market," Oxford Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(3), pages 240-255, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:oxdevs:v:48:y:2020:i:3:p:240-255
    DOI: 10.1080/13600818.2020.1808603
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13600818.2020.1808603
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13600818.2020.1808603?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oxdevs:v:48:y:2020:i:3:p:240-255. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CODS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.