Author
Listed:
- Ayse Y. Evrensel
- Wai Ching Poon
Abstract
The paper investigates the question whether constitutions are a proxy for institutional quality. It provides a discussion of institutions and states that constitutions are an example of a formal institution. As any other formal institution, constitutions are also influenced by countries’ informal institutions, including customs and belief systems. The novel content analysis goes beyond the often-used constitutional characteristics of government systems and electoral rules. In addition to the mentioned characteristics, the length, the number of revisions, and over 30 additional characteristics are coded for 109 constitutions, such as state religion and religious freedom as well as referring to state as mother, father or holy. Based on the content analysis, alternative constitutional scores are calculated. Statistically significant correlations are observed between measures of institutional quality such as corruption control and some of the constitutional scores. Based on the two widely-used economic development models, the OLS and two-stage least squares estimations are conducted with and without the institutional quality-related variables, where in the latter case the institutional quality-related variables are replaced by constitutional scores. Especially in two-stage least squares estimations, constitutional scores that emphasize the length, mention state religion, and refer to state as mother, father or holy statistically significantly and negatively affect income per capita. These findings point out to possible limitations to change that is aimed by constitutional revisions.
Suggested Citation
Ayse Y. Evrensel & Wai Ching Poon, 2021.
"Are constitutional characteristics a proxy for institutional quality? Evidence from 109 countries,"
Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 1911909-191, January.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:oaefxx:v:9:y:2021:i:1:p:1911909
DOI: 10.1080/23322039.2021.1911909
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oaefxx:v:9:y:2021:i:1:p:1911909. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/OAEF20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.