IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/oaefxx/v12y2024i1p2431542.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On shrinkage covariance estimators: how inefficient is 1/N strategy of covariance estimation for portfolio selection in foreign exchange market?

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Husnain
  • Shamrez Ali
  • Qaiser Munir
  • Ammar Jreisat

Abstract

We investigate portfolio selection performance as in Markowitz by evaluating variance matrix estimation criteria in the currency market. This study challenges theoretically rigorous shrinkage covariance estimators using multiple evaluation metrics: systematic loss function, risk profile of minimum variance portfolios, Herfindahl index, financial efficiency, and concentration level. We assess out-of-sample performance across conventional models, factor models, linear shrinkage estimators, and equally weighted portfolios by applying mean-variance criteria and minimum variance framework to the 10 most traded currencies. Our findings reveal that mean-variance optimal portfolios are concentrated, counterintuitive, and highly sensitive to optimizer input choices in currency markets. We discovered that shrinkage estimators do not provide additional benefits to investors and fund managers regarding systematic loss function and minimum variance portfolio risk profiles. The research highlights critical limitations in traditional portfolio construction approaches, demonstrating that portfolios built using mean-variance criteria are prone to significant input data sensitivity and tend to create overly concentrated investments. Consequently, the study suggests that investors and fund managers should exercise caution when selecting covariance estimators and consider exploring more diversified strategies to optimize portfolio performance in foreign exchange markets.This study critically evaluates the efficacy of covariance estimators in optimizing portfolios within the foreign exchange market, highlighting limitations of traditional and sophisticated shrinkage methods. Through comprehensive analysis, it demonstrates that mean-variance optimal portfolios are prone to input sensitivity and concentration, offering little advantage to fund managers over simpler 1/N diversification strategies. With a comprehensive dataset spanning decades, the research provides actionable insights into minimizing estimation errors and improving portfolio stability. The findings challenge prevailing methodologies, emphasizing simplicity and diversification to enhance decision-making for investors, fund managers, and policymakers navigating the complexities of currency markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Husnain & Shamrez Ali & Qaiser Munir & Ammar Jreisat, 2024. "On shrinkage covariance estimators: how inefficient is 1/N strategy of covariance estimation for portfolio selection in foreign exchange market?," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 2431542-243, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:oaefxx:v:12:y:2024:i:1:p:2431542
    DOI: 10.1080/23322039.2024.2431542
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23322039.2024.2431542
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23322039.2024.2431542?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oaefxx:v:12:y:2024:i:1:p:2431542. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/OAEF20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.