Author
Listed:
- Evangelos Vasileiou
- Elroi Hadad
Abstract
This study explores long-term investment strategies for individuals in European countries who have limited initial capital and may have no expertise in financial economics. We compare three strategies—Cost Average Plan (CAP), Bank Deposits Plan (BDP), and Buy and Hold (BnH)—by analyzing their risk and performance across six European Monetary Union (EMU) countries: France, Germany, Italy, Ireland, the Netherlands, and Spain, using data from January 2003 to December 2023. CAP is ideal for individuals aiming to build wealth gradually by investing a fixed amount monthly in an ETF that tracks an index, while BDP involves saving money in a bank account. This analysis also aligns with the European Commission’s Pan-European Personal Pension Product (PEPP) guidelines. The findings reveal that CAP generally outperforms monthly bank deposits, making it a better choice for those unable to invest large sums upfront, such as young individuals or new parents with long-term savings goals. Although CAP underperforms BnH in terms of returns, it offers significantly lower risk, making it suitable for investors with moderate risk tolerance. Additionally, CAP demonstrates greater stability in adverse market conditions compared to BnH. Future research could build on these results by incorporating more variables, markets, and investment horizons.This study provides valuable insights into the comparative performance of investment strategies within the European financial landscape, emphasizing their practical implications for investors with varying levels of capital and risk tolerance. By addressing the unique economic dynamics of EU countries, this research supports more informed financial decision-making, contributing to the broader goal of promoting financial equity and resilience in the EU.
Suggested Citation
Evangelos Vasileiou & Elroi Hadad, 2024.
"Benefits and drawbacks of the cost average plan as an alternative investment strategy in EMU countries,"
Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 2426539-242, December.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:oaefxx:v:12:y:2024:i:1:p:2426539
DOI: 10.1080/23322039.2024.2426539
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oaefxx:v:12:y:2024:i:1:p:2426539. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/OAEF20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.