Author
Listed:
- Ruth T. Gumede
- Lorraine Greyling
- Brian T. Mazorodze
Abstract
The welfare effects of government redistributive policy have been subject to considerable debate for decades. Against this background, this study explores the effect of government social spending on an empirically constructed measure of well-being in a panel of 16 upper middle-income countries and 38 high-income countries observed between 2002 and 2019. The study utilises the Generalised Method of Moments (GMM) Model to estimate the empirical relationship between government social spending and well-being. The results suggest that welfare gains in upper middle-income countries are derived from redistributive spending that prioritises schooling. On the other hand, rich countries are more likely to benefit from health-related spending. Based on the results the study confirms that disaggregated social spending in upper middle-income nations and wealthy nations does not impact aggregate well-being uniformly. Therefore, efforts to improve aggregate welfare through government redistributive spending ought to consider these attendant heterogeneities.This study examines the association between government social spending and well-being using a panel dataset of 54 upper middle-income and high-income countries. The novel feature of this investigation is embedded in the construction of the aggregate well-being index. We employed the Principal Components Analysis (PCA) technique to build a composite well-being index. This well-being indicator incorporates age dependency, access to water, access to sanitation, and life expectancy, the institutional quality is measured by four indicators which are government effectiveness, control of corruption, political stability and rule of law, environment degradation (CO2 emissions) and economic growth (GDP). This approach is expected to contribute substantially to the scarce literature in the field of well-being in upper middle-income countries and higher-income countries. A focus on well-being research is important since improved well-being leads to a better quality of life and stimulates economic performance through its influence on human development. The findings suggest that welfare gains in upper middle-income economies are attributed to social spending that prioritizes education. In contrast, wealthy countries are more likely to benefit from health-related spending. Policymakers should develop redistributive policies that address the specific needs of each region since evidence demonstrates that disaggregated social spending in upper middle-income countries and wealthy nations does not influence aggregate well-being uniformly.
Suggested Citation
Ruth T. Gumede & Lorraine Greyling & Brian T. Mazorodze, 2024.
"The impact of government spending on well-being: a case of upper middle-income countries and high-income countries,"
Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 2413657-241, December.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:oaefxx:v:12:y:2024:i:1:p:2413657
DOI: 10.1080/23322039.2024.2413657
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oaefxx:v:12:y:2024:i:1:p:2413657. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/OAEF20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.