IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/oaefxx/v12y2024i1p2402893.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Machine learning style rotation – evidence from the Johannesburg Stock Exchange

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Page
  • David McClelland
  • Christo Auret

Abstract

This study evaluates naïve and advanced prediction models when applied to style rotation strategies on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (‘JSE’). We apply 1- and 3-month style momentum as naïve predictors against three tree-based machine learning (‘ML’) algorithms (advanced predictors), namely Random Forest, XGBoost and LightGBM. Additionally, the study corrects for a shortcoming in the literature by incorporating trading costs into back-tested portfolio sorts. The results of the study are threefold. First, style rotation strategies based on advanced predictors achieve superior risk-adjusted returns when compared to naïve momentum. Of the three ML models applied, XGboost is superior, followed by LightGBM, implying that gradient boosters are superior to less advanced ensemble methods (Random Forest) which are in-turn superior to style momentum. Second, short-term momentum results in the highest share turnover across style rotation strategies, resulting in the largest negative impact associated with trading costs. Third, contrary to similar studies, the incorporation of price momentum as an independent variable in factor spanning tests renders most time-series alphas statistically insignificant.This study considers the application of machine learning ("ML") for style rotation. The results indicate that ML based rotation signals generate excess performance relative to momentum based style rotation when applied on a cross-section of emerging market (South African) listed equities.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Page & David McClelland & Christo Auret, 2024. "Machine learning style rotation – evidence from the Johannesburg Stock Exchange," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 2402893-240, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:oaefxx:v:12:y:2024:i:1:p:2402893
    DOI: 10.1080/23322039.2024.2402893
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23322039.2024.2402893
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23322039.2024.2402893?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oaefxx:v:12:y:2024:i:1:p:2402893. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/OAEF20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.