IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/oaefxx/v12y2024i1p2397808.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinants of poverty in rural cocoa farming communities in Ghana: unidimensional and multidimensional analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Solomon Yaw Agyeman-Boaten

Abstract

Poverty is a rural phenomenon due to the dominance of subsistence farming in rural communities. This study compares the estimates of unidimensional and multidimensional methodologies to analyse the factors that influence the poverty levels of cocoa farming households predominantly in rural Ghana. A census was conducted in the Chorichori community in Ghana using a structured questionnaire to gather information from 386 cocoa farming households. The multidimensional poverty index and expenditure-based poverty measures were used to estimate a bivariate probit regression to find the determinants of cocoa farming households’ poverty. The study’s outcome indicates that poverty among the cocoa farmers is jointly determined, unidimensionally and multidimensionally, by the access to healthcare, household child deaths, household’s school-age child not in school, access to farm inputs, and the age of the household head. Whereas the education level of the household head, frequency of ill-health, use of external labour, migration status, and relationship to the household head were significant in determining multidimensional poverty, the number of household members, cooperative union membership, access to farm water, occupational diversity, household access to financial credit, and the marital status of the household head significantly determined unidimensional poverty among the cocoa farmers. Even though both poverty measures produced fairly different results, the study’s findings showed the mutual and exclusive importance of the unidimensional and multidimensional poverty approaches in determining poverty and formulating good developmental policies for cocoa farmers. Therefore, selecting an approach should be based on prevailing circumstances, such as differences across locations and within households or entities.This research provides critical insights into the complex nature of poverty among cocoa farming households in rural Ghana. By comparing unidimensional and multidimensional poverty measures, the study reveals significant disparities in how poverty is assessed, offering a more comprehensive understanding of the socio-economic challenges faced by rural communities. This dual approach not only uncovers the socioeconomic factors that contribute to poverty but also reveals discrepancies and complementarities between different poverty measurement methods, offering a nuanced perspective that can enhance the accuracy of poverty assessments. The findings highlight the need for policymakers, development agencies, and social planners to target interventions that address the specific factors contributing to poverty in rural areas, thereby improving the effectiveness of poverty alleviation programs. By informing more holistic and inclusive policies, this study supports efforts to reduce poverty among rural cocoa farmers, ultimately contributing to broader economic development and social equity in Ghana and similar contexts across developing countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Solomon Yaw Agyeman-Boaten, 2024. "Determinants of poverty in rural cocoa farming communities in Ghana: unidimensional and multidimensional analysis," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 2397808-239, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:oaefxx:v:12:y:2024:i:1:p:2397808
    DOI: 10.1080/23322039.2024.2397808
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23322039.2024.2397808
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23322039.2024.2397808?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oaefxx:v:12:y:2024:i:1:p:2397808. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/OAEF20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.