IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/oaefxx/v12y2024i1p2385657.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impacts of intellectual protection and R&D collaborations on firm-level innovations: the moderating role of internal funding

Author

Listed:
  • Samuel Amponsah Odei
  • Ivan Soukal
  • Eva Freibauer Hamplová
  • Gabriela Trnková
  • Jan Hruška

Abstract

Investments in research and development (R&D) and innovations are proven to be vital catalysts for the successful transition into knowledge-based economies. Despite the growing importance attached to innovations and R&D, they have yet to receive enough scholarly attention in developing countries. This research aims to examine whether intellectual protection and innovation collaborations influence R&D and technological innovations. The empirical results involving 549 firms revealed that trademarks positively and marginally influence technological innovations but not R&D. The findings also revealed that domestic and international innovation collaborations with other firms and universities have a positive marginal effect on both technological innovations and R&D. The results also show that firms’ internal funds significantly moderate the relationship between intellectual protection, technological innovations, and R&D. The main implication from our finding is that Ghanaian firms should consider investing in intellectual protection and forging collaborations with domestic and foreign firms and universities to increase their innovation performance and competitiveness.This research uses insights from the systemic perspective of innovation to examine how firms’ open innovation (domestic and international) and intellectual property rights influence technological innovation and R&D in an emerging economy. We further assess the moderating effect of internal funds in the relationships. Our empirical model based on firm-level data from 549 Ghanaian firms revealed that firms’ collaborations with domestic collaborations with other firms increase technological innovation and R&D, while collaboration with foreign firms increases just technological innovation. The results further proved that firms collaborations with Ghanaian universities increase technological innovation but not R&D. Contrary, firms’ collaborations with foreign universities increase both technological innovation and R&D. Trademarks and copyright protections demonstrated to increase technological innovation and R&D. Utility models were found to increase R&D but not technological innovation. The result of the mechanism effects shows that firms’ internally generated funds positively moderate the relationships between utility models and both technological innovations and R&D. A similar result was found for the positive moderating role of internal funding in the relationships between copyrights and technological innovations and R&D. Contrary, the result proved that internal funding has a negative moderating effect in the relationship between trademarks and technological innovations, as well as R&D. The research findings have several significant implications for theory and practice from the standpoint of enterprises operating in emerging markets. Theoretically, although developed economies have garnered sufficient scholarly attention on innovation collaboration and intellectual property protection, their impact on innovation remains underexplored in emerging markets. Therefore, researching how open innovation involving both domestic and foreign partners as well as intellectual property protection and how they interact with firms’ internal funding resonates with emerging market perspectives. Our findings have provided empirical evidence that open innovation and intellectual property protection influence both technological and R&D activities. These findings contribute to the burgeoning systemic perspective of innovation literature. Second, this study adds some theoretical insights to our comprehension of the effect mechanisms through which these relationships work to impact technological innovation and R&D. These mechanism-effect relationships have not been fully examined by existing studies. The main practical implications from the finding that the low extent of open innovation is that policymakers could extend public funding support to firms and higher educational institutions that intend to collaborate with both domestic and foreign partners. Finally, the allocation of internal funds to assist R&D operations covered by trademarks, utility models, and copyrights should be a top priority for firm management in Ghana.

Suggested Citation

  • Samuel Amponsah Odei & Ivan Soukal & Eva Freibauer Hamplová & Gabriela Trnková & Jan Hruška, 2024. "The impacts of intellectual protection and R&D collaborations on firm-level innovations: the moderating role of internal funding," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 2385657-238, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:oaefxx:v:12:y:2024:i:1:p:2385657
    DOI: 10.1080/23322039.2024.2385657
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23322039.2024.2385657
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23322039.2024.2385657?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oaefxx:v:12:y:2024:i:1:p:2385657. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/OAEF20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.