IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/oaefxx/v12y2024i1p2382359.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impacts of economic policy uncertainties on agriculture export

Author

Listed:
  • Tadesse Soka Gignarta
  • Dinkneh Gebre Borojo
  • Zhenzhong Guan

Abstract

The agricultural sector has experienced increased haphazard policy interventions and has been exposed to different policy uncertainties. However, relatively little empirical research has been done on how economic policy uncertainties (EPU) affect agricultural exports. Thus, this paper explores the effects of trade and economic policy uncertainties on agriculture exports. It also assesses trade agreements’ mediation function and logistics performance in the EPU-agricultural export relationship. The Poisson pseudo-maximum likelihood (PPML) method is employed to apply the structural gravity specification using data for 60 high-income and emerging economies from 2007-2018. The findings disclose that policy uncertainties adversely impact agricultural exports. The impacts of EPU remain qualitatively indistinguishable from those of a high-income or an emerging economy. However, emerging economies suffer more severe trade policy uncertainty impacts on agriculture exports than high-income countries. The results further prove that strong logistics and trade agreements mitigate policy uncertainty’s effect on agriculture exports. Besides, the results demonstrate that policy actions to improve EPU to the mean value of the sample result in a 2.6% reduction in tariff. Policymakers should take swift and decisive actions to reduce uncertainties and promote agriculture exports. Additionally, this study calls for improving trade agreements and logistics infrastructure to promote agricultural exports.The agricultural sector has faced unpredictable policy uncertainties. Therefore, this study examines the effects of trade and economic policy uncertainties on agricultural exports, considering the role of trade agreements and the logistics performance of the countries. The study utilizes data from 60 agricultural goods exporting and 60 destination countries. The PPML model is utilized to exercise the structural gravity model to find the outcomes.Findings implied that economic policy uncertainty negatively affect agricultural exports, with emerging economies suffering more than high-income ones. However, better logistics performance and trade agreements can mitigate the negative impacts of uncertainties on agricultural exports. Besides, the results highlight that the higher the GDP per capita in the exporting country, the weaker the negative effects of EPU on agriculture export. Moreover, the results show that emerging economies have far more severe agricultural export losses from TPU shock than high-income countries.The significance of this research work lies in its practical implications and policy frameworks to elucidate the complex link between policy dynamics and agricultural export, enabling governments and policymakers to develop more resilient and adaptive policies to mitigate the adverse effects of trade and economic policy uncertainties. Besides, the findings of the study contribute to strategic decision-making for agricultural producers and exporters during high policy uncertainties.

Suggested Citation

  • Tadesse Soka Gignarta & Dinkneh Gebre Borojo & Zhenzhong Guan, 2024. "The impacts of economic policy uncertainties on agriculture export," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 2382359-238, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:oaefxx:v:12:y:2024:i:1:p:2382359
    DOI: 10.1080/23322039.2024.2382359
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23322039.2024.2382359
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23322039.2024.2382359?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oaefxx:v:12:y:2024:i:1:p:2382359. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/OAEF20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.