IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/oaefxx/v12y2024i1p2375643.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Upstarts vs incumbents: the interaction between fintech credit and bank lending in Sub-Saharan Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Tafirei Mashamba
  • Shenaaz Gani

Abstract

This study analyzes how fintech credit affects bank lending in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) and how this relationship is influenced by financial inclusion measured by bank branch networks. We utilized the system GMM to examine data spanning 19 SSA economies from 2013 to 2019. This study finds that fintech credit has a mixed effect on bank lending in SSA, depending on how it is measured. When fintech is measured by total alternative credit (fintech and Bigtech credit), there is a negative and significant relationship between Fintech and bank lending in SSA economies, suggesting that some borrowers are shifting towards fintech options. However, we observe a positive and significant relationship when we focus solely on fintech credit, suggesting that fintech can complement traditional bank lending, potentially by expanding access to financial services. Furthermore, this study underscores the importance of the presence of physical banks. Fintech lending growth has a negative net effect on bank lending when traditional banks reduce their branch network. This suggests that physical branches remain crucial for financial inclusion, particularly in areas with a limited digital infrastructure. These insights offer valuable guidance for policymakers and industry leaders seeking to promote financial inclusion and stability in SSA’s evolving financial landscape.This study investigates the impact of credit provided by fintech players on lending activities of traditional banks and the moderating effect of financial inclusion proxied by bank branch density on this nexus. Using data from 19 sub-Saharan African economies and GMM for estimation, the study identified a mixed effect of fintech on bank lending. When fintech is measured by total alternative credit (fintech and Bigtech) the results show that fintech tends to reduce bank lending, suggesting that some borrowers are shifting towards fintech products potentially competing with traditional banks. However, fintech credit alone show a positive effect, suggesting a complimentary effect of fintech activities to enhance financial access. The study also shows that fintech lending negatively affects bank lending when banks reduce branch networks, emphasizing the importance of continued physical bank branches. Overall, this research highlights the complex interplay between fintech and traditional banking in Sub-Saharan Africa, providing valuable insights for policymakers and industry leaders seeking to promote financial inclusion and stability in the region.

Suggested Citation

  • Tafirei Mashamba & Shenaaz Gani, 2024. "Upstarts vs incumbents: the interaction between fintech credit and bank lending in Sub-Saharan Africa," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 2375643-237, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:oaefxx:v:12:y:2024:i:1:p:2375643
    DOI: 10.1080/23322039.2024.2375643
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23322039.2024.2375643
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23322039.2024.2375643?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oaefxx:v:12:y:2024:i:1:p:2375643. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/OAEF20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.