Author
Listed:
- Kalalto Gashe
- Zerayehu Sime
- Melkamu Mada
Abstract
The aim of this study is to explain the output growth across countries as an effect of intellectual capital growth. Defining intellectual capital as an integral of all the various intangibles, it argued to resolve the conceptual complexities and empirical inconsistencies. For this, the study defined the flow of new ideas as a function of change in intellectual capital level. Thus, it developed a model in which broad ideas predetermine the quality of capital and labor necessary for final goods production. The model was estimated using dynamic common correlated effect estimators for a panel of 29 countries from all income levels and geographic regions from 1990 to 2020. The results show a positive and significant contribution of national intellectual capital to economic growth. Hence, policymakers must enhance innovation in all spaces and phases of learning.The introduction of intellectual capital (IC) to explain economic growth, amidst unceasing complexities in conceptions and modeling intangibles, offers unprecedented significance for academics and policy issues. The concept of IC helps to encompass both technological and social innovation capabilities. Hence, for scholars interested in this field, the approach provides a novel model that explain the rate of flow of new technological and non-technological ideas of a given nation as a function of change in national IC level. This new idea generation function is also safe from ‘scale effect’, an inevitable problem facing all various generations of endogenous models. For economic policy makers the approach could simplify the conceptual complexities and also helps to look for domestic technological and non-technological capabilities before embarking on absorption of frontier technologies.
Suggested Citation
Kalalto Gashe & Zerayehu Sime & Melkamu Mada, 2024.
"Intellectual capital and economic growth: evidence from some selected countries,"
Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 2330429-233, December.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:oaefxx:v:12:y:2024:i:1:p:2330429
DOI: 10.1080/23322039.2024.2330429
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oaefxx:v:12:y:2024:i:1:p:2330429. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/OAEF20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.