IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/oaefxx/v12y2024i1p2308672.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The extensive and intensive effects of Vietnam’s technical measures on agricultural imports

Author

Listed:
  • Bich Ngoc Nguyen

Abstract

Technical measures, particularly Sanitary and Phytosanitary measures (SPS) and Technical barriers to trade (TBT) can affect to firms’ market entry and the volume of trade. Yet, technical measures is ambiguous and complicated, especially for developing countries. Therefore, the study analyses the extensive and intensive effects of SPS and TBT measures imposed by Vietnam on agricultural imports across products and partners. The empirical analysis employs gravity model with Heckman two-stage estimation at the disaggregated level from 2007 to 2019. The findings show that SPS and TBT have positive effects at the extensive margin while having heterogeneous effects at the intensive margin. Across different products, technical measures imposed on agricultural processed products are significant positive to firms’ participation but are insignificant to the scale of trade. Imposing SPS measures on animal products facilitates market entry, while decreasing the intensive margin. In plant products, SPS measures play the market barriers to protect the advantage of exporting products, but firms can expand the import volume after adapting to TBT regulations. The estimation also shows that SPS and TBT increase the probability of imports from developed countries while having insignificant effects on developing countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Bich Ngoc Nguyen, 2024. "The extensive and intensive effects of Vietnam’s technical measures on agricultural imports," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 2308672-230, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:oaefxx:v:12:y:2024:i:1:p:2308672
    DOI: 10.1080/23322039.2024.2308672
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23322039.2024.2308672
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23322039.2024.2308672?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oaefxx:v:12:y:2024:i:1:p:2308672. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/OAEF20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.