Author
Listed:
- Raavinuthala Satya Krishna Sharma
- Kumar Bijoy
- Arunaditya Sahay
Abstract
Maintaining the optimal level of liquidity in the banking system has always been a challenge for banks globally. Liquidity deficit Indian Banks turned to liquidity surplus due to the demonetization of higher denomination currencies in November 2016. The liquidity deficit has the potential to trigger systemic risk whereas a surplus can weaken monetary transmission leading to the creation of asset bubbles. This study explores the impact of various interventions of policymakers to maintain the optimal liquidity by simultaneously insulating the banks’ profitability and overall economic growth from the policy’s negative impact using Auto-Regressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) regression. The study records and analyses the impacts of “Fiscal Deficit”, “Lending and Deposit Rates”, and “Credit Growth Rate” on Liquidity Deficit, GDP growth and Banks’ Profitability levels. It is found that Fiscal deficit is negatively related to Liquidity deficit and GDP growth but increases Banks’ profit whereas Lending rates have an insignificant impact on Liquidity Deficit. Increasing Deposit rates have a positive impact on Liquidity deficit, negative on Banks’ Profit, and immediate positive relationships with GDP growth which changes to negative at the third lag. Similarly, the Credit growth rate has a positive relationship with the Liquidity deficit, augments GDP growth, and reduces Banks’ profit. It is also observed that the profit of Indian Scheduled Commercial banks has reduced after the demonetization. This study, apart from contributing to academic literature, will help the monetary authorities and the financial institutions in their policy decisions for managing the liquidity issues in the market.
Suggested Citation
Raavinuthala Satya Krishna Sharma & Kumar Bijoy & Arunaditya Sahay, 2022.
"Issues in liquidity management in banking system: An empirical evidence from Indian commercial banks,"
Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 2122190-212, December.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:oaefxx:v:10:y:2022:i:1:p:2122190
DOI: 10.1080/23322039.2022.2122190
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oaefxx:v:10:y:2022:i:1:p:2122190. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/OAEF20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.