IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/oabmxx/v9y2022i1p2152160.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identification of factors for developing going concern prediction models

Author

Listed:
  • Paul Hammond
  • Mustapha Osman Opoku
  • Paul Adjei Kwakwa

Abstract

The study aimed to identify factors that can be used in models that predict going concern of enterprises. The study employed the best-worst method of multi-criteria decision-making technique to evaluate and rank the factors. Twenty-one potential determinants were identified from the literature reviewed. Twelve decision-makers with rich experience and different professional backgrounds scrutinised and ranked the factors that affect going concern of organisations. A linear BWM solver was used to determine the optimal weights of each category. Liquidity and profitability ratios emerged as the two best determinants that are key in predicting going concern. The current ratio emerged as the overall critical determinant, while board independence measured as the ratio of non-executive board members to total board members popped up as the influential corporate governance variable for determining going concern. It is, therefore, recommended that going concern models should incorporate liquidity and profitability ratios as well as corporate governance issues.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul Hammond & Mustapha Osman Opoku & Paul Adjei Kwakwa, 2022. "Identification of factors for developing going concern prediction models," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 2152160-215, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:9:y:2022:i:1:p:2152160
    DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2022.2152160
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23311975.2022.2152160
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23311975.2022.2152160?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:9:y:2022:i:1:p:2152160. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cogentoa.tandfonline.com/OABM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.