IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/oabmxx/v9y2022i1p2110644.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Work pressure, job satisfaction and auditor turnover: Evidence from Vietnam

Author

Listed:
  • Quoc Thuan Pham
  • Thi Giang Tan Tran
  • Thi Ngoc Bich Pham
  • Luan Ta

Abstract

The research aims to determine the factors that explain auditor’s decision to leave the audit profession. We employ a mixed approach of both qualitative and quantitative methods. A qualitative study is firstly performed using focus groups with the audit professionals to explore any new determinant(s) of auditor turnover in the Vietnam environment. The focus group indicates a new factor—the pressure of holding the Professional Certificate (CPA certificate)—that likely increases auditor turnover. A quantitative study is then conducted using survey method with a sample of 197 responses from current and former audit staff working for Vietnamese audit firms. We find that the perceptions of the profession, work conditions, work environment, and professional certificate pressure are associated with decisions to leave the audit profession. More importantly, professional certificate pressure—the emergent determinant—is the most influencing factor of auditor turnover. Some practical implications for policy makers to retain experienced and competent audit staff are also proposed.

Suggested Citation

  • Quoc Thuan Pham & Thi Giang Tan Tran & Thi Ngoc Bich Pham & Luan Ta, 2022. "Work pressure, job satisfaction and auditor turnover: Evidence from Vietnam," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 2110644-211, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:9:y:2022:i:1:p:2110644
    DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2022.2110644
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23311975.2022.2110644
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23311975.2022.2110644?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:9:y:2022:i:1:p:2110644. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cogentoa.tandfonline.com/OABM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.