Author
Listed:
- Manolito E. Parungao
- Adrian Galido
- Maria Leah Suazo
- Lovely A. Parungao
Abstract
M&A prediction is a growing interest in the field of business studies. However, prevailing M&A prediction techniques are still widely based from the analyses of financial variables through quantitative approaches. This has led M&A scholars’ attention to call for the contribution of non-financial studies coupled with the opportunity for qualitative approaches to supplement new methodological insights. Accordingly, this study delved to explore the potential of qualitative data to describe M&A target firms and develop an M&A completion prediction model that is based on categorical patterns found among American and European owned firms’ letters to shareholders ranked in fortune/global/fast 500. This study postulates that analyzing M&A targets’ letters to shareholders could provide relevant categories to describe the attractiveness of firms as M&A targets that are also indicative to the prediction of the completion of the offered deals. This study employed a mixed methodology using content analysis and decision tree analysis. The results of the study had led to provide four interesting category observations that described M&A target firms’ letters to shareholders, which showed less sensitivity to ownership and border-related offers. Further, the study developed an M&A completion prediction model with 67% predictive accuracy. This study provides implications for firms’ management on the posturing contents featured in firm’s letters to shareholders could expose to signal their firms as M&A targets and to readers as such as stock traders and corporate investors to look into the posturing contents of firms’ letters to shareholders, so as to identify potential M&A targets.
Suggested Citation
Manolito E. Parungao & Adrian Galido & Maria Leah Suazo & Lovely A. Parungao, 2022.
"Exploring qualitative data as predictors for M&A: Empirical analysis of target firms’ letters to shareholders,"
Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 2084970-208, December.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:9:y:2022:i:1:p:2084970
DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2022.2084970
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:9:y:2022:i:1:p:2084970. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cogentoa.tandfonline.com/OABM20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.