IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/oabmxx/v9y2022i1p2024116.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mediating role of formalization of RM methods among the perceived business risk and organization performance

Author

Listed:
  • Akmal Shahzad
  • Bushra Zulfiqar
  • Mumtaz Ali
  • Ayaz ul Haq
  • Maryam Sajjad
  • Ahmad Raza

Abstract

The rapid changes in technology and globalization lead to mediating role in formalization of RM methods among perceived business risk and organization performance. Questionnaire distributed among 301 financial professionals of selected industries and duly filled questionnaires received back 204. Pilot study was conducted at 96 responses to check the validity and reliability of instrument. Questionnaire distributed among CFOs/Finance managers/Risk Managers of selected industries. The study results imply that the performance of the organization has a significant positive relationship with all components of perceived Business risk (PBR) such as economic factors, financial indicators, technological change, political uncertainty, and market competition. It is also found that the Formalization of RM Methods mediates among the component of PBR and organization performance. The results provide meaningful insights for managers, which are used generally by any organization as a guideline to improve the organization’s performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Akmal Shahzad & Bushra Zulfiqar & Mumtaz Ali & Ayaz ul Haq & Maryam Sajjad & Ahmad Raza, 2022. "Mediating role of formalization of RM methods among the perceived business risk and organization performance," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 2024116-202, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:9:y:2022:i:1:p:2024116
    DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2021.2024116
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23311975.2021.2024116
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23311975.2021.2024116?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:9:y:2022:i:1:p:2024116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cogentoa.tandfonline.com/OABM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.