IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/oabmxx/v8y2021i1p1938931.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinants of industry expertise outsourced IAF: Do company and auditor attributes affect the selection?

Author

Listed:
  • Saeed Rabea Baatwah
  • Khaled Salmen Aljaaidi
  • Ehsan Saleh Almoataz
  • Mohammed Saleh Bajaher

Abstract

Outsourcing the internal aud it function (IAF) is a worldwide practice attractive to companies, practitioners and regulators because it is believed that providers of this function are objective and competent and can provide high-quality audit. This study explores the potential influence of company and auditor characteristics on selecting outsourced IAF providers with industry expertise. Using 334 observations for non-financial companies that outsourced this function to an external provider over the period 2010–2017, logistic regression suggests that company characteristics such as size, issue of new equity, age, and total accruals significantly determine the selection of industry-expertise outsourced IAF (IEOIAF) providers. We report similar findings when considering alternative approaches for measuring industry expertise, using a matching sample method, and controlling for the potential effect of endogeneity. In additional analysis, we explore these determinants, classifying the IEOIAF providers into big4 or second-tier audit firms; we find that size, leverage, quick ratio, concentrated ownership, loss, assets turnover, age, total accruals, external auditor type, and audit fees are the major determinants in the choice of an IEOIAF provider. Our study is of interest to a variety of users and provides the first empirical evidence for the determinants of outsourced IAF providers with industry expertise.

Suggested Citation

  • Saeed Rabea Baatwah & Khaled Salmen Aljaaidi & Ehsan Saleh Almoataz & Mohammed Saleh Bajaher, 2021. "Determinants of industry expertise outsourced IAF: Do company and auditor attributes affect the selection?," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 1938931-193, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:8:y:2021:i:1:p:1938931
    DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2021.1938931
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23311975.2021.1938931
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23311975.2021.1938931?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:8:y:2021:i:1:p:1938931. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cogentoa.tandfonline.com/OABM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.