IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/oabmxx/v8y2021i1p1920113.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Industry expertise on audit committee and audit report timeliness

Author

Listed:
  • Nahla Abdulrahman Mohammed Raweh
  • Abdulwahid Ahmed Hashed Abdullah
  • Hasnah Kamardin
  • Mazrah Malek

Abstract

Motivated mainly by streams of research that suggest industry expertise of audit committee (AC) is the best-qualification for directors, and that evidence on the value of this expertise is limited. This study examines whether AC financial expertise is associated with audit report timeliness and mainly explores the effect of AC industry expertise on audit report timeliness by supporting AC financial expertise. The study used a sample from a unique setting and pooled regression analysis, and the study reveals that AC financial expertise is not associated with reducing audit report delay. More significantly, it documents that a reduction delay in audit reporting, improving audit timeliness, is more apparent when the members’ industry expertise level enhances AC’s financial expertise members. This study also records that AC members with financial expertise and industry expertise are strongly associated with decreasing the audit report delay. Financial expertise is associated with a shorter audit report delay in the subgroup of industry expertise. Overall, this study highlights the added value of industry expertise with financial expertise in improving audit committees’ effectiveness in the context of timely reporting.

Suggested Citation

  • Nahla Abdulrahman Mohammed Raweh & Abdulwahid Ahmed Hashed Abdullah & Hasnah Kamardin & Mazrah Malek, 2021. "Industry expertise on audit committee and audit report timeliness," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 1920113-192, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:8:y:2021:i:1:p:1920113
    DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2021.1920113
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23311975.2021.1920113
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23311975.2021.1920113?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:8:y:2021:i:1:p:1920113. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cogentoa.tandfonline.com/OABM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.