Author
Listed:
- Brighton Nyagadza
- Ernest M. Kadembo
- Africa Makasi
Abstract
The goal of this article was to explore internal stakeholders’ emotional attachment and corporate brand perceptions through corporate storytelling for branding. Due to the nature of the research questions, the research was purely qualitative in nature. A total of fifty four (54) in-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted from 2019 to 2020. These constituted the bedrock of qualitative data analysis for the study. An interpretivist research paradigm, anchored on subjectivist ontology, were both applied as research philosophy pillars. This was done by the researchers in order to get deeper understanding of corporate stories for branding in the six (6) selected listed company. Purposive sampling was used to select respondents from three (3) levels of authority, thus operational, tactical and strategic level. The mutual connection on variables of corporate stories for branding and Impression Management theory elements depicted that these are related to internal stakeholder’s corporate brand perceptions. The research results showed that there is a positive nexus between corporate stories for branding with emotional attachment and internal stakeholders’ corporate brand perceptions. Recommendations include that corporate management need to consciously involve internal stakeholders in developing corporate stories for branding, as it is crucial in carving positive corporate brand perceptions and emotional attachment. The research contributes to the theory and practice by shaping listed corporates to be able to maximise effectiveness of their corporate strategies, meant to improve internal corporate reputation and motivation of internal stakeholders.
Suggested Citation
Brighton Nyagadza & Ernest M. Kadembo & Africa Makasi, 2020.
"Exploring internal stakeholders’ emotional attachment & corporate brand perceptions through corporate storytelling for branding,"
Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 1816254-181, January.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:7:y:2020:i:1:p:1816254
DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2020.1816254
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:7:y:2020:i:1:p:1816254. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cogentoa.tandfonline.com/OABM20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.