IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/oabmxx/v7y2020i1p1796249.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Revisit intention and satisfaction: The role of destination image, perceived risk, and cultural contact

Author

Listed:
  • Bang Nguyen Viet
  • Huu Phuc Dang
  • Ho Hai Nguyen

Abstract

This paper explores the relationship between destination image, cultural contact, perceived risk, satisfaction, and the revisit intention of international tourists to Binh Thuan province in Vietnam based on data obtained from 405 international tourists. Employing Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) techniques, the study delivered two key results. The first finding is that revisit intention is directly affected by satisfaction, attractiveness, accommodation service, cultural contact, and perceived risk. Secondly, satisfaction is directly affected by attractiveness, accommodation service, cultural contact, and perceived risk. These results confirm the moderating role of both nationality and marital status on the relationships from cultural contact and attractiveness to satisfaction, but not revisit intention. However, the research has certain limitations: (i) due to the limited resources available to conduct the research, the sample size was limited to 405 international tourists in Binh Thuan province; and (ii) this study conducted sampling using direct interview methods of tourists during the peak season.

Suggested Citation

  • Bang Nguyen Viet & Huu Phuc Dang & Ho Hai Nguyen, 2020. "Revisit intention and satisfaction: The role of destination image, perceived risk, and cultural contact," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 1796249-179, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:7:y:2020:i:1:p:1796249
    DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2020.1796249
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23311975.2020.1796249
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23311975.2020.1796249?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sanja Obradović & Vladimir Stojanović & Aleksandra Tešin & Ivan Šećerov & Milana Pantelić & Dragan Dolinaj, 2022. "Memorable Tourist Experiences in National Parks: Impacts on Future Intentions and Environmentally Responsible Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-22, December.
    2. Asad Ur Rehman & Muhammad Shoaib & Mohsin Javed & Zuhair Abbas & Ayesha Nawal & Roman Zámečník, 2022. "Understanding Revisit Intention towards Religious Attraction of Kartarpur Temple: Moderation Analysis of Religiosity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-19, July.
    3. Milan Ćulić & Miroslav D. Vujičić & Časlav Kalinić & Milosav Dunjić & Uglješa Stankov & Sanja Kovačić & Đorđije A. Vasiljević & Željko Anđelković, 2021. "Rookie Tourism Destinations—The Effects of Attractiveness Factors on Destination Image and Revisit Intention with the Satisfaction Mediation Effect," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-16, May.
    4. Bodur S. Alonazi & Thowayeb H. Hassan & Mostafa A. Abdelmoaty & Amany E. Salem & Mahmoud I. Saleh & Mohamed Y. Helal & Yasser Ahmed Mohamed & Magdy Sayed Abuelnasr & Daniel Alemshet Gebreslassie & Mon, 2023. "Tourist Behavior in the Cruise Industry Post-COVID-19: An Examination of Service Quality, Corporate Image, and Intentions to Pay and Revisit," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-21, May.
    5. Li Xu & Jie Zhang & Zhenghu Nie, 2022. "Role of Cultural Tendency and Involvement in Heritage Tourism Experience: Developing a Cultural Tourism Tendency–Involvement–Experience (TIE) Model," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-16, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:7:y:2020:i:1:p:1796249. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cogentoa.tandfonline.com/OABM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.