IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/oabmxx/v7y2020i1p1772618.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

National culture as a moderator between social norms, religiosity, and tax evasion: Meta-analysis study

Author

Listed:
  • Sutrisno T
  • Muh Dularif

Abstract

The objective of this research is to present the meta-analysis results of the relationship of social norms and religiosity with tax evasion, with national culture as a moderating variable. Previous researches show mixed results of the relationship between social norms, religiosity, and tax evasion. Meta-analysis is considered a way out of saturated and inconsistent research since it provides an efficient and systematic approach to make a robust conclusion. This research synthesizes 54 results of 14 individual articles published from 1989 to 2017. This study shows three main findings. Although social norms are not effective to fight tax evasion, religiosity is a useful instrument to decrease tax evasion. Theoretically, national culture plays a pivotal role as a variable to moderate social norms with tax evasion. However, this variable can not moderate religiosity with tax evasion. These findings show that the Theory of Planned Behavior inconsistently predicts the influence of social norms on tax evasion. Practically, tax authorities should consider involving religious leaders to encourage the awareness of tax compliance and to decrease tax evasion.

Suggested Citation

  • Sutrisno T & Muh Dularif, 2020. "National culture as a moderator between social norms, religiosity, and tax evasion: Meta-analysis study," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 1772618-177, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:7:y:2020:i:1:p:1772618
    DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2020.1772618
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23311975.2020.1772618
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23311975.2020.1772618?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:7:y:2020:i:1:p:1772618. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cogentoa.tandfonline.com/OABM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.