IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/oabmxx/v7y2020i1p1724703.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is merit pay changing ethos in public administration?

Author

Listed:
  • Renato Ruffini
  • Giuseppe Modarelli
  • Roberta Sferrazzo
  • Matteo Turri

Abstract

This article aims to explore the changes in the organizational culture of public administrations following the implementation of performance-related pay—PRP systems. The work explores the switch to an explicit remuneration system through the implementation of incentives and focuses on the effects, positive or negative, this has had on the ethos of public administrations. Data from a survey carried out among private and public employees in a specific area of Southern Italy are used to analyze how the shift from an implicit to an explicit remuneration system has impacted the public servants’ ethos. Due to the application of PRP, public servants are now expected to be compensated based on their performance. The ineffective management of incentives in public administrations affects the intrinsic motivation of public employees and may lead to moral disengagement. While the previous literature has focused on the practical challenges and limitations of PRP, less has been written about how PRP has changed the culture of public administrations. This article shows how PRP can change the traditional ethos of public administrations’ services based on the Weberian model of bureaucracy, replacing the latter with a new one.

Suggested Citation

  • Renato Ruffini & Giuseppe Modarelli & Roberta Sferrazzo & Matteo Turri, 2020. "Is merit pay changing ethos in public administration?," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 1724703-172, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:7:y:2020:i:1:p:1724703
    DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2020.1724703
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23311975.2020.1724703
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23311975.2020.1724703?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:7:y:2020:i:1:p:1724703. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cogentoa.tandfonline.com/OABM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.