IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/oabmxx/v11y2024i1p2422562.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Borrower switching behaviour on a P2P lending platform: a study of switching path analysis technique

Author

Listed:
  • Rasyidi Faiz Akbar
  • Badri Munir Sukoco
  • Fiona Niska Dinda Nadia

Abstract

Despite borrower disloyalty being a concern, path decisions must still be analysed. Using the switching path analysis technique, this study analysed the triggers, determinants, and consequences of borrower switching. A non-probability sampling method was employed for this analysis. Specifically, snowball sampling was used to collect data because of limited access to Indonesian peer-to-peer lending (P2P) borrowers in borrower lending groups. Snowball sampling was used to recruit more P2P lending borrowers in Indonesia. The sampling method included 31 participants. The findings revealed the following: (1) triggers (situational, influential, and reactional); (2) switching determinants (push, pull, and swayer); and (3) consequences of switching (ir-path or re-path). This study contributes to the service literature by providing a sequential process lens to address how borrowers switch or stop with one P2P lending provider. The findings provide practitioners with data that will allow them to learn how borrowers switch and prevent them from switching.

Suggested Citation

  • Rasyidi Faiz Akbar & Badri Munir Sukoco & Fiona Niska Dinda Nadia, 2024. "Borrower switching behaviour on a P2P lending platform: a study of switching path analysis technique," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 2422562-242, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:11:y:2024:i:1:p:2422562
    DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2024.2422562
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23311975.2024.2422562
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23311975.2024.2422562?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:11:y:2024:i:1:p:2422562. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cogentoa.tandfonline.com/OABM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.