Author
Abstract
This study investigates the relationship between sustainability committee (SC) effectiveness and integrated reporting (IR) quality in the global oil and gas industry, focusing on the moderating role of financial performance. Drawing on stakeholders’ and legitimacy theories, this study hypothesises that SC effectiveness positively influences IR quality and that financial performance moderates this relationship. Using a sample of 500 firm-year observations from 100 companies listed in Forbes Global 2000 from 2018 to 2022, the findings reveal that SC effectiveness significantly enhances IR quality. Specifically, SC size and diligence are positively linked to higher IR quality. Although the direct effect of SC independence on IR quality is insignificant, it becomes significant when financial performance is considered a moderating factor. Interestingly, financial performance negatively moderates the relationship between SC effectiveness and IR quality, although this effect disappears when analysing individual SC components separately. These results highlight the complex interplay among SC effectiveness, financial performance, and IR quality, suggesting that companies should focus on enhancing SC size and diligence to improve reporting quality, particularly in financially constrained firms. Additionally, to harness the positive moderating effect of financial performance, companies should ensure that financial resources are strategically allocated to support the sustainability committee’s activities and promote a holistic view of value creation, incorporating financial and non-financial aspects.
Suggested Citation
Ally Adam Mshana, 2024.
"Sustainability committee effectiveness and integrated reporting quality in the oil and gas industry ‘does corporate financial performance matter?’,"
Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 2401155-240, December.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:11:y:2024:i:1:p:2401155
DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2024.2401155
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:11:y:2024:i:1:p:2401155. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cogentoa.tandfonline.com/OABM20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.