IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/oabmxx/v11y2024i1p2389466.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do existing competitiveness models comprehensively assess the competitiveness context of the contemporary agribusiness sector? A systematic review

Author

Listed:
  • Muluken Ayalew Worku
  • Kenenisa Lemi Debela
  • Huub L.M. Mudde

Abstract

This review study intended to investigate how existing agribusiness competitiveness studies understood the competitiveness concept and the measurement employed. To address the aims, the study used a systematic review strategy, particularly using the PRISMA 2020 protocol. In this respect, clear inclusion and exclusion criteria were used to select 60 relevant articles from the total of 2,563 agribusiness competitiveness-focused articles obtained from various databases. The study also used content analysis to analyze the data that were gathered and descriptive research design to present the results descriptively. The finding shows that competitiveness concept is understood from marketing perspective or forward integration, particularly from export. Methodologically, the finding revealed that there is a shortage of studies conducted using explanatory design and inferential statistical analysis. RCA, Porter Diamond, and RTA models are the most accepted and applied models to investigate competitiveness in the existing studies but the first two in particular are not complete. Therefore, it is suggested that future studies focus on investigating agribusiness competitiveness using explanatory design and inferential statistical analysis. It is also recommended that NRCA, RTA, and the proposed competitiveness framework has to be used together to investigate agribusiness competitiveness comprehensively.

Suggested Citation

  • Muluken Ayalew Worku & Kenenisa Lemi Debela & Huub L.M. Mudde, 2024. "Do existing competitiveness models comprehensively assess the competitiveness context of the contemporary agribusiness sector? A systematic review," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 2389466-238, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:11:y:2024:i:1:p:2389466
    DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2024.2389466
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23311975.2024.2389466
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23311975.2024.2389466?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:11:y:2024:i:1:p:2389466. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cogentoa.tandfonline.com/OABM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.