Author
Listed:
- Dyah Gandasari
- David Tjahjana
- Diena Dwidienawati
- Mochamad Sugiarto
Abstract
The utilization of the social network analysis (SNA) approach dates back to 1928, and since then, it has shown a notable increase and has contributed to a body of research significantly. However, recent years have seen limited bibliometric analyses focusing on the SNA approach. This study seeks to conduct an in-depth review of SNA literature through bibliometric analysis, employing the methodology derived from Garza-Reyes’s Five Phases of Bibliometric Analysis. The findings reveal the refinement of 4487 datasets sourced from Scopus databases, with visualization accomplished using VOSviewer. The cluster analysis finds that as many as 5 clusters with a set of keywords. Keywords that can become potential issues for future study found in this study such as integration, risk management, politics, online social network, collaboration network, Facebook, health care organization, stakeholder engagement, group process, clinical trial, risk-taking, adolescent, family, social organization, aggression, pandemic and sars-cov-2, et cetera.People have been studying how we connect with each other since way back in 1928. Social network analysis (SNA) is the method they use for that. Over the years, it’s become super popular and has added a lot to what we know. Not many have been checking out this method in recent years using a tool called bibliometric analysis. Therefore, the authors decided to delve into it. The authors dove into a bunch of data (around 4487 sets of info) from this big research database called Scopus. The authors then used a cool tool called VOSviewer to help see all this information. The authors found 5 clusters of data with different keywords. These keywords are like the main topics such as risk management, online social network, collaboration network, health care organization, stakeholder engagement, group process, family, social organization, aggression, pandemic and more, could be big topics for future research.
Suggested Citation
Dyah Gandasari & David Tjahjana & Diena Dwidienawati & Mochamad Sugiarto, 2024.
"Bibliometric and visualized analysis of social network analysis research on Scopus databases and VOSviewer,"
Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 2376899-237, December.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:11:y:2024:i:1:p:2376899
DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2024.2376899
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:11:y:2024:i:1:p:2376899. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cogentoa.tandfonline.com/OABM20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.