IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/oabmxx/v11y2024i1p2371072.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prioritization of CIFs taking into account multiple criteria for the construction of efficient portfolios

Author

Listed:
  • Eduar Fernando Aguirre González
  • Pablo César Manyoma Velásquez
  • Diego Fernando Manotas-Duque

Abstract

This study presents a methodology for making decisions on the number of Collective Investments Funds (CIF) for portfolio construction using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) techniques, particularly a combination called PrAToVi. The proposed methodology includes the integration of economic and financial theories of investment in equity portfolios with the multi-criteria techniques described in PrAToVi, which allows a finite number of alternatives to be evaluated hierarchically under qualitative and quantitative criteria. This methodology was evaluated with funds managed by fiduciaries and with information from the end of 2021, which is contained in the technical sheets of each fund, and, the compares with information about 2022 and 2023. The computational results show the importance and efficiency of successfully integrating traditional investment criteria in stock portfolios and multi-criteria methodologies to generate a ranking of those CIFs with which portfolios can be created and an adequate balance between multiple criteria, including profitability and risk, can be found. This approach also considers the investment decision-making process regarding assets managed by Colombian SFs. The proposed methodology can be applied to other emerging markets such as Colombia and can manage this alternative type of investment.

Suggested Citation

  • Eduar Fernando Aguirre González & Pablo César Manyoma Velásquez & Diego Fernando Manotas-Duque, 2024. "Prioritization of CIFs taking into account multiple criteria for the construction of efficient portfolios," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 2371072-237, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:11:y:2024:i:1:p:2371072
    DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2024.2371072
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23311975.2024.2371072
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23311975.2024.2371072?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:11:y:2024:i:1:p:2371072. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cogentoa.tandfonline.com/OABM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.