Author
Listed:
- Nirupam Mukhopadhyay
- Narayan Chandra Nayak
Abstract
Green innovation entails the production assimilation or exploitation of unique methods of doing business that result in a decrease in environmental risks. Green innovation is a complex and multifaceted process, encompassing product, process, and organizational dimensions, each with unique factors influencing firm performance, business efficiency, and sustainable development. This research investigates the impact of eco-innovation on the financial performance of firms across 12 G7 and BRICS countries from 2013 to 2022. Considering 2100 listed firms, the study explores how process, product, and organizational eco-innovation dimensions affect business performance. Utilizing Feasible Generalized Least Square (FGLS) regression and System Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) models, the results indicate a positive impact of environmental innovation on firm performance. Further, in BRICS countries, process, and organizational eco-innovations have greater impacts, while in G7 countries, product eco-innovation gets precedence. The varying impacts reflect the unequal stages of development and priorities between the two groups. It also signifies that G7 countries possess more resources for green innovation, while BRICS countries are still evolving. The findings therefore underscore the importance of tailored regulations, monitoring, and support to facilitate the integration of eco-innovations into business processes. Moreover, there is a need for firms to adopt and execute green innovation-based economic activities that would make them financially efficient, and strengthen the growth imperatives of both the groups of countries. Collaboration between developed and emerging economies would go a long way fostering common goals across them.
Suggested Citation
Nirupam Mukhopadhyay & Narayan Chandra Nayak, 2024.
"Examining the relationship between green innovation dynamics and firm performance: a comparative study of BRICS and G7 countries,"
Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 2364836-236, December.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:11:y:2024:i:1:p:2364836
DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2024.2364836
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:11:y:2024:i:1:p:2364836. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cogentoa.tandfonline.com/OABM20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.