IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/oabmxx/v11y2024i1p2364374.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

International ambidexterity future research based on bibliometric analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Leidi Ruano-Arcos
  • Diana Escandón-Barbosa
  • Josep Rialp-Criado

Abstract

This research aims to improve the understanding of the scientific contributions to international ambidexterity and identify possible lines of research. We conducted a systematic literature review of 193 articles on international ambidexterity published from 2003 to 2023 that are indexed in Scopus. The publications were systematically analyzed, and scientific mapping was carried out with the VOSviewer and ATLAS TI tools. The study reveals that research in this field focuses on multinational companies from developing countries, dynamic capabilities, internationalization, innovation, and business performance. The United States, the United Kingdom, and China lead research in this area, with the most prominent journals being the International Business Review, the Thunderbird International Business Review, and the Journal of Business Research. Based on the findings, the article suggests seven categories for future research: types of ambidexterity, organizational factors, internationalization, contextual factors, effects, relationships and capabilities, innovation, and networks. We encourage academics and practitioners to contribute to this area of research and deepen our understanding of international ambidexterity.This article delves into the notion of ‘international ambidexterity’, or a company’s capacity to balance exploration and exploitation in foreign markets. The study focuses on multinational corporations from developing countries through a comprehensive examination of literature, highlighting dynamic capacities, internationalization, innovation, and company performance. According to the research, the United States, the United Kingdom, and China are the leaders in this sector, with magazines such as the International Business Review and the Journal of Business Research playing important roles. Future study should focus on nine areas, including ambidexterity kinds, organizational characteristics, and environmental impacts, according to the findings. The paper urges researchers and practitioners to contribute to the changing knowledge of international ambidexterity, so encouraging additional research in this dynamic and essential field.The dedication of the ECGESA research group to understanding social and economic phenomena is consistent with the larger purpose of contributing to human, social, and economic development. Their multidisciplinary approach, which included scholars from other faculties, connects with the discussion of ‘international ambidexterity’. Both emphasis on macro and micro dynamics within varied contexts demonstrates a similar commitment to solving difficult challenges. The research described in the abstract, which emphasizes the relevance of dynamic capacities, internationalization, innovation, and firm performance in multinational enterprises from developing countries, is consistent with ECGESA’s mission of understanding economic and organizational dynamics. The ECGESA group’s collaborative attitude and search of answers to greater social concerns resonates with the appeal for scholars and practitioners to contribute to understanding international ambidexterity. Both highlight the need of multidisciplinary collaboration and ongoing investigation to enhance knowledge in their respective domains and contribute to the larger landscape of research and development.

Suggested Citation

  • Leidi Ruano-Arcos & Diana Escandón-Barbosa & Josep Rialp-Criado, 2024. "International ambidexterity future research based on bibliometric analysis," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 2364374-236, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:11:y:2024:i:1:p:2364374
    DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2024.2364374
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23311975.2024.2364374
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23311975.2024.2364374?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:11:y:2024:i:1:p:2364374. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cogentoa.tandfonline.com/OABM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.