IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/oabmxx/v11y2024i1p2350804.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A systematic literature review on organizational citizenship behavior: conceptualization, antecedents, and future research directions

Author

Listed:
  • Muluken Ayalew Worku
  • Kenenisa Lemi Debela

Abstract

This review study investigated two main questions on organizational citizenship behavior: first, how is OCB conceptualized in management studies? And the second question is, what are the antecedents of OCB in management studies? The study used a systematic review strategy to address the above questions. In this respect, clear inclusion and exclusion criteria were employed to select 53 relevant articles from the total of 2367 OCB articles obtained from various databases for analysis purpose. Other research methods were also used in the study, such as the collected data, which was analyzed via content analysis and finally presented descriptively using a descriptive research design. The finding shows that these days, OCB and OCBI/OCBO are still understood from 1988 Organ’s OCB constructs. There are limited studies on individuals’ dispositions, task characteristics, leadership behaviors, and group characteristics as types of antecedents of OCB in the existing literature. It is recommended to develop advanced OCB constructs that can be applicable to all types of organizations. As shown by the shortage of OCB studies in some types of antecedents, future researchers are advised to conduct their studies on individuals’ dispositions, task characteristics, leadership behaviors, and group characteristics using the conceptual framework suggested by this study.

Suggested Citation

  • Muluken Ayalew Worku & Kenenisa Lemi Debela, 2024. "A systematic literature review on organizational citizenship behavior: conceptualization, antecedents, and future research directions," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 2350804-235, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:11:y:2024:i:1:p:2350804
    DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2024.2350804
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23311975.2024.2350804
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23311975.2024.2350804?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:11:y:2024:i:1:p:2350804. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cogentoa.tandfonline.com/OABM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.