IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/oabmxx/v11y2024i1p2344743.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A systematic literature review of Auditing Practices research landscape and future research propositions using bibliometric analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Amar Johri
  • Raj Kumar Singh

Abstract

This investigation aims to conduct a bibliometric analysis to amalgamate the publication patterns of auditing practices. As a result, this research scrutinizes the historical, contemporary, and forthcoming studies on auditing practices. The content is sourced from the Scopus database, and following the application of specific selection criteria, a total of 516 documents are chosen for bibliometric scrutiny. Citation analysis is employed to identify the most influential publications and contributors. In order to determine the most productive authors and sources, an analysis of productivity is undertaken. The bibliometric analysis used to discover five principal thematic clusters in auditing practice research. The themes that are extensively referenced include the legitimacy of audits, their function, archival auditing, the proliferation of audits, audit technologies, and the analysis of big data. By means of co-citation analysis, the works that are most frequently referenced are identified, while co-occurrence analysis is employed to identify the current themes that are trending in research on auditing practices. The present trends and clusters of themes encompass sustainability assurance, the role of auditors in financial crises, blockchain technology, professional skepticism, and the detection of fraudulent activities. The future directions for research are presented in the academic papers.

Suggested Citation

  • Amar Johri & Raj Kumar Singh, 2024. "A systematic literature review of Auditing Practices research landscape and future research propositions using bibliometric analysis," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 2344743-234, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:11:y:2024:i:1:p:2344743
    DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2024.2344743
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23311975.2024.2344743
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23311975.2024.2344743?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:11:y:2024:i:1:p:2344743. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cogentoa.tandfonline.com/OABM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.