Author
Listed:
- I Nyoman Darmayasa
- Nyoman Sentosa Hardika
Abstract
This research aims to understand whether the Core Tax Administration System (CTAS) will strengthen the power or the trust dimensions of the Slippery Slope Framework (SSF) tax compliance model. The research hypothesis is that the implementation of the CTAS will strengthen the power and the trust dimensions of the SSF tax compliance model. This qualitative study uses the Krippendorff content analysis technique. The data come from discourses by tax authorities and tax practitioners related to the CTAS published on YouTube channels. The study finds that the words that most often appear are ‘CTAS’, ‘integrated’, ‘data’, ‘taxpayer compliance’, ‘tax revenue’, ‘comparative compliance arrangement’, ‘identity number’, ‘taxpayer registration number’, ‘audit’, ‘service’, and ‘trust’. A number of the texts are related to strengthening the power to integrate taxpayer data to create comparative compliance arrangements and increase tax revenue. According to the SSF tax compliance model, which is formed on the concepts of power and trust, improving professional services using the CTAS will improve taxpayers’ trust in the tax authority. This study answers the research hypothesis by finding that the implementation of the CTAS will begin by strengthening the power of the tax authority, and that this will be followed by increased trust. The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) theory explains the increase in the tax authority’s power through the implementation of the CTAS from the perspective of perceived usefulness. Strengthening this power gives legitimacy to the tax authority to develop programmes that support an increase in tax revenues after integrating the taxpayer profile data.
Suggested Citation
I Nyoman Darmayasa & Nyoman Sentosa Hardika, 2024.
"Core tax administration system: the power and trust dimensions of slippery slope framework tax compliance model,"
Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 2337358-233, December.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:11:y:2024:i:1:p:2337358
DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2024.2337358
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:11:y:2024:i:1:p:2337358. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cogentoa.tandfonline.com/OABM20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.