IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/oabmxx/v11y2024i1p2332503.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accountability of pondok pesantren; a systematic literature review

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmad Nurkhin
  • Abdul Rohman
  • Tri Jatmiko Wahyu Prabowo

Abstract

This article presents the systematic literature review (SLR) of accountability of pondok pesantren (Islamic boarding school). The purpose is to provide a review of the existing literature (theoretical/empirical) on the accountability of pondok pesantren and to analyze the future agenda of research. By using the Publish or Perish application, 200 units of initial article data were obtained for further analysis. The results showed that there were few reputable international journal articles (indexed by Scopus) that published articles on the topic of pondok pesantren accountability and focused more on financial management. The other related topics are accounting and financial reports, governance and accountability in Islamic organizations. The qualitative research method was more used and shows that accountability of pondok pesantren applied double accountability (responsibility to God and to others). Furthermore, it was found that the relevance of accountability for pondok pesantren with local cultural values other than Islamic values as a basis. In addition, the theory that was often used as a basis for accountability of pondok pesantren was legitimacy theory. The topics for the future research agenda on accountability of pondok pesantren is accountability of asset management and analysis the determinant of pondok pesantren accountability.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmad Nurkhin & Abdul Rohman & Tri Jatmiko Wahyu Prabowo, 2024. "Accountability of pondok pesantren; a systematic literature review," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 2332503-233, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:11:y:2024:i:1:p:2332503
    DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2024.2332503
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23311975.2024.2332503
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23311975.2024.2332503?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:11:y:2024:i:1:p:2332503. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cogentoa.tandfonline.com/OABM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.