Author
Abstract
The legitimacy recognition of comparative advertising is closely related to the production enthusiasm of operators and the protection of the rights and interests of consumers, and thus become an important factor that may affect market competition fairness and social sustainable development. However, few researches have summarized the existing study of comparative advertising, while it is significant to review the changes and explore the future development trend, so as to improve relevant legislation. In this study, to summarize its research status, hotspots, and trends, CiteSpace 6.2.R4 was used to analyze 856 WoS core collection articles and 20 CSSCI articles related to comparative advertising dated 1993–2023, which presents an overview of the study of comparative advertising and relevant legitimacy recognition in China and other countries. Based on the analysis including co-occurrence, co-citation, and reference cluster, this paper looked at the research status and built up the knowledge mapping, which reveals scholars and research teams from universities from eight countries play a more important role in promoting comparative advertising research. It shows scholars mainly studying its concept and characteristics, its impact on different market players, its role on players of different ages, and its coping strategies. The study of its legitimacy recognition has also been included mainly focusing on the fairness of market competition, protection of consumers’ interests, etc., but ignoring the issue of social sustainable development. According to its bibliometric research findings, this study also suggests some topics for future research to provide direction and guidance on related topics.
Suggested Citation
Wen-xi Cai & Bo Xiang, 2024.
"Visualization analysis of the research status, hotspots, and trends of legitimacy recognition of comparative advertising (1993–2023),"
Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 2332501-233, December.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:11:y:2024:i:1:p:2332501
DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2024.2332501
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:11:y:2024:i:1:p:2332501. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cogentoa.tandfonline.com/OABM20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.