IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/oabmxx/v11y2024i1p2331281.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From oil reliance to financial resilience: have economic sanctions made OPEC countries’ healthcare financing independent from oil?

Author

Listed:
  • Salem Al Mustanyir

Abstract

The OPEC governments mainly financed their budgets by relying on oil production, similar to many other governments globally. However, the world’s ongoing economic development, changes in countries’ political relationships, and exchange of sanctions could have adverse consequences for government financing, including healthcare. This study investigates whether economic sanctions have shifted governments’ healthcare financing from oil dependence. Quantitative data covering 2000 to 2020 were extracted from the WHO and assessed using a comparison of means Welch’s t-test. The results showed the independence of government healthcare financing from oil in Libya, Iraq, and Iran, evident in the absence of a response to changes in their sanctions programs, attributed to their long experience with sanctions. This is in contrast to Venezuela, where governmental healthcare financing was adversely affected after sanctions were imposed. With global economic uncertainty, continuous political changes, and the global transformation to green energy, this study suggests that countries worldwide maintain financing strategies other than dependence on oil, with constant revisions to global developments.

Suggested Citation

  • Salem Al Mustanyir, 2024. "From oil reliance to financial resilience: have economic sanctions made OPEC countries’ healthcare financing independent from oil?," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 2331281-233, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:11:y:2024:i:1:p:2331281
    DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2024.2331281
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23311975.2024.2331281
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23311975.2024.2331281?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:11:y:2024:i:1:p:2331281. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cogentoa.tandfonline.com/OABM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.