IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/oabmxx/v11y2024i1p2330664.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Omni-channel shopping experiences – to share or not to share?

Author

Listed:
  • Melanie Wiese

Abstract

This study proposes an extended Stimulus-Organism-Response framework that investigates perceived seamlessness and product information as drivers of omni-channel shopping satisfaction, as well as the resulting consumer response outcomes. There is a specific focus on consumption and experience-sharing behaviour and on the moderating role of social media attractiveness. An online self-administered questionnaire resulted in 433 responses from South African shoppers. The hypotheses were tested using structural equation modelling and a multi-group CFA approach. Interestingly, information visibility was the strongest predictor of satisfaction. Furthermore, convenience of sharing was confirmed as a mediator, while social media attractiveness acted as moderator in the relationship between satisfaction and experience sharing. The research contributes to the fast-growing trend of omni-channel retailing, especially from a consumer perspective. While research typically focuses on consumption-sharing behaviour, this study adopted a dual-sharing perspective by investigating not only customer influence as a type of consumption behaviour sharing, but also experience sharing behaviour. The applicability of an extended S-O-R framework is confirmed in an emerging market context while providing practical insights for retailers.

Suggested Citation

  • Melanie Wiese, 2024. "Omni-channel shopping experiences – to share or not to share?," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 2330664-233, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:11:y:2024:i:1:p:2330664
    DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2024.2330664
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23311975.2024.2330664
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23311975.2024.2330664?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:11:y:2024:i:1:p:2330664. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cogentoa.tandfonline.com/OABM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.