IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/oabmxx/v11y2024i1p2319393.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing an evidence-based faculty-led study abroad business course

Author

Listed:
  • Jerry DiMaria
  • Deborah M. Gray
  • James Melton
  • Nancy Hicks

Abstract

Study abroad experiences are highly valuable as internationalization plays an increasingly important role in the higher education curriculum and business (Ghemawat & Bastian, 2017). Business schools have long recognized the value of the study abroad experience for both students and faculty (Black & Duhon, 2006). Given these conditions, one would expect best practices to be widely applied in the execution of short-term study abroad programs. Yet, this study’s review and analysis of faculty-led study abroad proposal guidelines did not find this to be the case. Content analysis was used on 396 pages of university faculty-led study abroad proposal guidelines from 19 randomly chosen universities in the United States to determine what best practices are being communicated to faculty. Our findings suggest that there is little evidence-based guidance on creating, planning, and executing a short-term faculty-led study abroad course. Building on this finding, we provide a review of the best practices literature and use this corpus to anchor a tutorial for designing a faculty-led study abroad course. These instructions provide business faculty with the information necessary to design a successful evidence-based short-term study abroad program.

Suggested Citation

  • Jerry DiMaria & Deborah M. Gray & James Melton & Nancy Hicks, 2024. "Developing an evidence-based faculty-led study abroad business course," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 2319393-231, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:11:y:2024:i:1:p:2319393
    DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2024.2319393
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23311975.2024.2319393
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23311975.2024.2319393?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:11:y:2024:i:1:p:2319393. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cogentoa.tandfonline.com/OABM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.