IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/oabmxx/v11y2024i1p2316644.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unsupervised learning analysis of European working condition

Author

Listed:
  • Olumide S. Adesina
  • Adedayo F. Adedotun
  • Semiu A. Alayande
  • Emmanuel O. Efe-Imafidon
  • Tolulope F. Adesina
  • Hillary I. Okagbue
  • Oluwakemi O. Onayemi

Abstract

Workers require good working conditions to enhance their job performance, in this study, we conducted a survey of European working conditions in 2022 and compared the results with that of 2016 using an unsupervised learning approach for exploratory data analysis and determining the relationships. Hence, the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was adopted. The analyses were in two parts for both the 2016 and 2022 surveys. Following the PCA, the first part shows that European workers are mostly characterized by cheerfulness and good spirits. The second part reveals that European workers are best characterized by enthusiasm in their work. Test statistics showed that the European working condition for the two periods does not differ significantly. The working conditions in Europe have not been altered in the space of six years. This study recommends that the working condition in Europe should be improved so that employers would continue to give their best.

Suggested Citation

  • Olumide S. Adesina & Adedayo F. Adedotun & Semiu A. Alayande & Emmanuel O. Efe-Imafidon & Tolulope F. Adesina & Hillary I. Okagbue & Oluwakemi O. Onayemi, 2024. "Unsupervised learning analysis of European working condition," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 2316644-231, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:11:y:2024:i:1:p:2316644
    DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2024.2316644
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23311975.2024.2316644
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23311975.2024.2316644?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:11:y:2024:i:1:p:2316644. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cogentoa.tandfonline.com/OABM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.