IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/oabmxx/v11y2024i1p2301137.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effect of incentive types and organizational value statements on corporate social responsibility decisions

Author

Listed:
  • Hijroh Rokhayati
  • Mahfud Sholihin
  • Hadrian Geri Djajadikerta

Abstract

This study examines the effect of incentive types and organizational value statements on corporate social responsibility (CSR) decisions. It used a 2 × 2 between-subject experimental design and analyzed the data using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). The participants were undergraduate students in the accounting department of a major university in Central Java, Indonesia. The results show that incentives in the form of recognition encourage CSR decisions more than financial incentives. This study also provides evidence that environmental-based value statements encourage managers to make CSR decisions rather than financial-based value statements. This study, however, finds there is no interaction between the type of incentives and organizational value statements on CSR decisions. The implication of the results of this study is the importance of using the types of recognition incentives and value statements that focus on sustainability to promote CSR decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Hijroh Rokhayati & Mahfud Sholihin & Hadrian Geri Djajadikerta, 2024. "The effect of incentive types and organizational value statements on corporate social responsibility decisions," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 2301137-230, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:11:y:2024:i:1:p:2301137
    DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2023.2301137
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23311975.2023.2301137
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23311975.2023.2301137?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:11:y:2024:i:1:p:2301137. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cogentoa.tandfonline.com/OABM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.