IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/oabmxx/v11y2024i1p2292365.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing factors affecting Chinese institutional investors’ willingness to pay for green bonds in Beijing, Shanghai, and Shenzhen

Author

Listed:
  • Yoshihiro Zenno
  • Kentaka Aruga

Abstract

Previous studies on green bonds (GBs) in China have not extensively analyzed how investor characteristics such as demographic background and environmental concerns affect Chinese investors’ decisions to invest in GBs. Therefore, these aspects should be examined to understand the GB market and its potential expansion. To address this gap, this study analyzed how Chinese institutional investors’ social attributes, environmental concerns, and residential locations affect their decisions to purchase GBs. The ordered-probit model estimation revealed that experience in investing in GBs and high environmental awareness lowers the yield required for institutional investors to invest in GBs, suggesting that these factors increase investors’ willingness to pay (WTP) for GBs. The study also finds that investors in Shanghai have a higher WTP for GBs than those in Beijing and Shenzhen. The results provide important insights for the government and financial authorities to implement measures aimed at increasing institutional investors’ interest in the environment. Additionally, these results can drive GB issuers to promote sales to institutional investors with an environmental focus.

Suggested Citation

  • Yoshihiro Zenno & Kentaka Aruga, 2024. "Comparing factors affecting Chinese institutional investors’ willingness to pay for green bonds in Beijing, Shanghai, and Shenzhen," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 2292365-229, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:11:y:2024:i:1:p:2292365
    DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2023.2292365
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23311975.2023.2292365
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23311975.2023.2292365?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:11:y:2024:i:1:p:2292365. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cogentoa.tandfonline.com/OABM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.