IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/oabmxx/v10y2023i3p2257831.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A quantitative assessment of honor culture men and the impact of sports, key demographics, and affiliations on work discrimination

Author

Listed:
  • Rebecca S. Merkin
  • Sigmund Shipp

Abstract

This study replicates and extends previous findings on work discrimination by focusing on white lower-class males, a neglected vulnerable discriminated group, and distinguishes how belonging or not belonging to an honor culture impacts them and lower SES others’ work discrimination experiences. We also analyzed variables that could act to mitigate against work discrimination experiences. Examining data from the 2009 High School Longitudinal Study (HSLS) hierarchical regression modeling results showed: (1) honor-culture male students who participated in high school sports are less likely to experience work discrimination than their peers who didn’t (2) the higher the socioeconomic status (SES), the less likely males feel discriminated against at work; but SES was more related to work discrimination in honor cultures than in non-honor cultures (3) across all models, Black, LatinX, and other-races males experience greater work discrimination than their white peers; but race was more related to work discrimination in non-honor cultures than in honor cultures (4) White honor-culture males experience greater work discrimination than their higher-income white male counterparts.

Suggested Citation

  • Rebecca S. Merkin & Sigmund Shipp, 2023. "A quantitative assessment of honor culture men and the impact of sports, key demographics, and affiliations on work discrimination," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 2257831-225, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:10:y:2023:i:3:p:2257831
    DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2023.2257831
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23311975.2023.2257831
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23311975.2023.2257831?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:10:y:2023:i:3:p:2257831. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cogentoa.tandfonline.com/OABM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.