Author
Listed:
- Marian Maclean
- Michael Karikari Appiah
- Joyce Francisca Addo
Abstract
Organizational learning (OL) offers knowledge sharing and innovation to firms. OL is a driver of firms’ competitive advantage and performance, yet this symbiotic relationship has not been adequately explored in most developing countries. It is against this backdrop that the current study aims to develop a baseline model in the context of a low- and middle-income country to explain the extent to which OL dimensions impact firms’ competitive strategy and performance. Our article utilizes a quantitative research approach and deductive reasoning. Cross-sectional survey data have been collected from small and medium enterprises across manufacturing, hospitality, extraction, transportation, construction, and oil and gas subsectors. Our data have been analyzed using the structural equation modelling technique. The study has revealed that OL dimensions of knowledge acquisition, knowledge distribution, and knowledge interpretation have positive and significant impacts on firms’ competitive strategy and performance. Moreover, competitive strategy significantly and positively mediates the relationship between OL dimensions and firm performance. The theoretical implications of the study include the development of a baseline model to explain the extent to which OL dimensions impact firms’ competitive strategy and performance in the context of lower-middle-income countries, where such studies are largely inadequate. Practically, this study is among the very few to present contextual determinants of firm competitive strategy and performance to guide investors and business owners in attracting, retaining, and transferring knowledge in order to formulate fierce strategies.
Suggested Citation
Marian Maclean & Michael Karikari Appiah & Joyce Francisca Addo, 2023.
"How organizational learning dimensions influence firms’ competitive strategy and performance in a lower-middle-income country: A mediation model,"
Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 2256073-225, December.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:10:y:2023:i:3:p:2256073
DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2023.2256073
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:10:y:2023:i:3:p:2256073. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cogentoa.tandfonline.com/OABM20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.