Author
Listed:
- Onome Christopher Edo
- Egbe-Etu Etu
- Imokhai Tenebe
- Oluwarotimi Samuel Oladele
- Solomon Edo
- Oladapo Ayodeji Diekola
- Joshua Emakhu
Abstract
The novel coronavirus caused a lifestyle shift, and the acceptance of offsite financial transactions is still a case for financial technology (fintech). Mobile financial transactions continue to be at an all-time low, and financial institutions are developing approaches for financial digitalization acceptability. The present study attempts to understand users’ motivations for fintech adoption. The technology acceptance model (TAM) and the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTUAT) were utilized to uncover the rationale behind technology adoption. This study explored the drivers inhibiting the adoption of financial technology in Nigeria during the pandemic. A machine learning (ML) approach was implemented to examine fintech adoption predictors using a self-administered consumer survey of 480 account holders. Survey responses were analyzed using a set of ML models (naïve Bayes, logistic regression, K-nearest neighbors, decision trees, and support vector machines), revealing the features and decision criteria for predicting perceived technology adoption. The decision tree outperformed the other models, with an accuracy of over 84%, precision of 88%, recall of 86%, F1-score of 84%, and area under the curve of 87%. The result indicates that customers are concerned about their safety. Thus, furthering their sense of risk. These results provide a roadmap for financial institutions and policymakers to understand behavioral attitudes toward adopting fintech and suggest strategies for attracting customers to the fintech space.
Suggested Citation
Onome Christopher Edo & Egbe-Etu Etu & Imokhai Tenebe & Oluwarotimi Samuel Oladele & Solomon Edo & Oladapo Ayodeji Diekola & Joshua Emakhu, 2023.
"Fintech adoption dynamics in a pandemic: An experience from some financial institutions in Nigeria during COVID-19 using machine learning approach,"
Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 2242985-224, December.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:10:y:2023:i:2:p:2242985
DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2023.2242985
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:10:y:2023:i:2:p:2242985. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cogentoa.tandfonline.com/OABM20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.