IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/oabmxx/v10y2023i2p2226422.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Beyond the innovator’s Dilemma: The process and effect of fintech regulatory environment

Author

Listed:
  • Geoffrey Otieno
  • Ruth Kiraka

Abstract

Previous research has established that certain characteristics of lead users, such as their ability to identify trends and the benefits they expect from an innovation, are important in determining the success of an innovation. However, the role of regulatory authorities and the innovation process in influencing innovation outcomes has not been thoroughly explored. This study aims to fill this gap by examining the impact of these factors on innovation success, using a mixed-method approach. Data were collected from 321 lead users and eight regulators through both quantitative and qualitative surveys, and analyzed using SPSS and NVivo. The results show that the number of partners involved in the innovation process is a significant factor, whereas work experience has an impact only when considered in conjunction with other variables. This study contributes to the understanding of lead user innovation by demonstrating that factors beyond just trends and benefits can influence the success or failure of innovation and provides new insights into the role of the innovation process and regulatory authorities.

Suggested Citation

  • Geoffrey Otieno & Ruth Kiraka, 2023. "Beyond the innovator’s Dilemma: The process and effect of fintech regulatory environment," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 2226422-222, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:10:y:2023:i:2:p:2226422
    DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2023.2226422
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23311975.2023.2226422
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23311975.2023.2226422?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:10:y:2023:i:2:p:2226422. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cogentoa.tandfonline.com/OABM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.