IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/oabmxx/v10y2023i2p2218175.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Board structure and the likelihood of financial statement fraud. Does audit fee matter? Evidence from manufacturing firms in the East Africa community

Author

Listed:
  • Lucas Ekiru Kaituko
  • Peter Nderitu Githaiga
  • Stephen Kimutai Chelogoi

Abstract

This study examines the moderating effect of audit fee on the relationship between board structure and the likelihood of financial statements fraud (LFSF). The study uses the logistic regression and a sample of 15 manufacturing firms listed within the East African Community partner states from 2007 to 2021. The Beneish M-Score is used a proxy measure of the likelihood of financial statements fraud. The findings of this paper revealed that board gender diversity, board financial expertise, board independence, frequency of board meetings, audit fee are significant variable in reducing the likelihood of financial statements fraud. The result further demonstrated that the impact of board structure on LFSF is significantly influenced by audit fee. The findings of this study provide valuable information for investors and regulators in the EAC and other regions with similar legal and institutional environment on the nexus between board structure, audit fee and LFSF. The current study contributes to the board structure and LFSF literature by assessing whether audit fee moderates the relationship among listed manufacturing firms in the EAC. Like prior studies on financial statements fraud, the main limitations of this study is the measurement of LFS. Hence, the study wholly inherited the limitations of the Beneish M-Score.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucas Ekiru Kaituko & Peter Nderitu Githaiga & Stephen Kimutai Chelogoi, 2023. "Board structure and the likelihood of financial statement fraud. Does audit fee matter? Evidence from manufacturing firms in the East Africa community," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 2218175-221, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:10:y:2023:i:2:p:2218175
    DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2023.2218175
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23311975.2023.2218175
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23311975.2023.2218175?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:10:y:2023:i:2:p:2218175. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cogentoa.tandfonline.com/OABM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.