IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/oabmxx/v10y2023i2p2204601.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mandatory CSR reporting and disability employment. Evidence from India

Author

Listed:
  • Kofi Mintah Oware

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to examine whether mandatory CSR reporting affects the disability employment of listed firms and whether a family(non) management firm’s perspective matter in the Indian context. From 2009 to 2020, the data set includes 80 firms with 960 firm-year observations, including 783 firm-year observations for family-managed firms and 177 firm-year observations for non-family-managed firms on the Indian stock exchange. Panel regression with random effect assumptions and probit regression are the research models for examining the study. The first findings show that mandatory CSR reporting increases the disability employment of listed firms in India. The second findings show that mandatory CSR reporting has a positive and statistically significant association with disability employment of family firms in India. Similarly, the third findings show that mandatory CSR reporting has a positive and statistically significant association with disability employment of non-family firms in India. However, the magnitude effect expressed in the beta coefficient is higher in non-family firms than in family firms. Our findings are unaffected by firm-level characteristics. Our research adds to the discussion of factors that influence disability employment by providing fresh information on required CSR reporting, which has been investigated in prior studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Kofi Mintah Oware, 2023. "Mandatory CSR reporting and disability employment. Evidence from India," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 2204601-220, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:10:y:2023:i:2:p:2204601
    DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2023.2204601
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23311975.2023.2204601
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23311975.2023.2204601?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:10:y:2023:i:2:p:2204601. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cogentoa.tandfonline.com/OABM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.