IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/oabmxx/v10y2023i1p2161204.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Business strategy typologies and the preference of earnings management practices: Evidence from Indonesian listed firms

Author

Listed:
  • Antonius Herusetya
  • Elfina Astrella Sambuaga
  • Sabrina O. Sihombing

Abstract

We examine the relationship between business strategy typologies and managers’ involvement in accrual earnings management (AEM) and real activities manipulation (RAM). Furthermore, we investigate whether prospectors (defenders) show a lower (higher) preference for earnings management than defenders (prospectors), both for the AEM and the RAM concurrently. The study sample was selected from publicly held companies in Indonesia from 2012 to 2018. Following Miles and Snow’s (1978, 2003) framework, we use a comprehensive construct of business strategy to determine each firm’s typology of business strategy based on the score, and we employ multiple regression models to test our hypotheses and robustness checks. Our test results find that prospector-type business strategies have lower AEM and RAM than defender-type business strategies. Next, we find strong evidence that prospectors are less likely to have earnings management preferences than defenders. Our additional tests using the individual RAM level find some evidence that prospectors are less likely to engage in discretionary operating expenses, supporting our main results. Our findings have practical implications for investors, policymakers, and other stakeholders that prospector-type business strategies that focus on innovation and long-term performance achievements do not necessarily provide incentives for management to engage in earnings management, leading to lower earnings quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Antonius Herusetya & Elfina Astrella Sambuaga & Sabrina O. Sihombing, 2023. "Business strategy typologies and the preference of earnings management practices: Evidence from Indonesian listed firms," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 2161204-216, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:10:y:2023:i:1:p:2161204
    DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2022.2161204
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23311975.2022.2161204
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23311975.2022.2161204?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:10:y:2023:i:1:p:2161204. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cogentoa.tandfonline.com/OABM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.