IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/nzecpp/v53y2019i1p44-62.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Expertise: is it a gift or a curse? Evidence from the New Zealand health care sector

Author

Listed:
  • Somi Shin

Abstract

This study investigates whether highly skilled health care providers are at a disadvantage because they attract difficult cases, by examining all publicly funded patient discharges in New Zealand over 1999–2011. Using a patient's transfer status and the complication and co-morbidity level as the measures of task difficulty, the effects of task difficulty on three performance indicators commonly used in practice, the length of hospital stay and the probabilities of 30-day mortality and readmission, are calculated. The results confirm that the disadvantage does exist, but certain providers do better in the presence of such disadvantage. Even among highly skilled providers, the variance in performance is large. The results also suggest that specialisation may be beneficial, as transferred cases treated by highly skilled providers have better outcomes. In particular, the provider treating the most complex cases in the country achieves the best outcomes for transferred patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Somi Shin, 2019. "Expertise: is it a gift or a curse? Evidence from the New Zealand health care sector," New Zealand Economic Papers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(1), pages 44-62, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:nzecpp:v:53:y:2019:i:1:p:44-62
    DOI: 10.1080/00779954.2017.1373694
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00779954.2017.1373694
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00779954.2017.1373694?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:nzecpp:v:53:y:2019:i:1:p:44-62. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RNZP20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.